HomeWho it’s forInvestors, lenders & funds
TN/AUD/07
Edition 2027 · effective 1 January 2027
For investors, lenders & funds
Conflict destroys value long before it reaches a court.
Portfolio founders fall out, JV partners deadlock, earn-outs are disputed, borrowers struggle. Neutral capability protects value at the moment it is most at risk, and quietly.
§ 01What you really need
Five needs, in your words.
Drawn from how people in your position actually describe the problem, not from procedure.
(Needs)
Value protection
Act before conflict damages the asset.
Speed
Decisions on the timeline of the investment.
Discretion
No public disputes with portfolio companies.
Independent numbers
Valuations and determinations that settle questions.
Portfolio-wide approach
One Neutral programme across holdings.
What usually goes wrong: using control rights first and conversation later; letting valuation questions go to court; ignoring founder conflict until a down round.
§ 02The cost of waiting
What the evidence says.
Sourced and dated. Use the calculator to estimate your own.
Record value of new ICC cases in 2024: 841 cases, 2,392 parties from 136 jurisdictions.
ICC Dispute Resolution Statistics 2024, via Global Legal Post · 2024 ↗Commercial mediations that settle on the day, with a further ~20% settling in the following weeks.
CEDR, Mediation success rate · 2024 ↗§ 03Evaluation for you
9 questions people in your position bring to an evaluator.
§ 04Situations you may face
10 situations where a Neutral helps.
§ 05Roles that fit
The Neutral roles people like you use most.
§ 06How we can help
Evaluation services for people in your position.
Clarity DeepView™
A full Independent Neutral Evaluation™ with the twelve-part report of the Handbook (NP 6.3): mandate, evidence, issue-by-issue analysis, risk and uncertainty, calibrated conclusions and stated limitations. Sold against a specific question and deliverable, not a template.
Fixed quote after conflict and scope reviewClarity Snapshot™
A short, reasoned written view on a single, precisely framed question, within tight limits agreed at scope review: a small document set, no interviews and no findings of fact on contested evidence. It is not a substitute for a full evaluation, an investigation or regulated specialist work.
Annual retainer plus Snapshots as usedStanding Evaluator
A qualified evaluator appointed at the start of a relationship, kept informed, and available to give an independent view whenever a question arises. Activation rules, response times and information access are written into the agreement.
§ 07Frame your question
Describe it. Get the evaluation question.
Written for investors, lenders & funds. Leave out names and confidential details.
Explain neutrality to me as…
Your question (optional)
Connecting…
The answer
§ 08Read next