An international institution for Independent Neutral Evaluation

HomeSituationsCommunity & public lifePublic–private project interface

TN/SIT/31
Edition 2027 · effective 1 January 2027

Community & public life · Public–private project interface

A public authority and a private partner share a project, and different accountabilities.

PPP and concession relationships last decades and face public scrutiny. Standing Neutrals and dispute boards protect both value and public trust.

§ 01What it looks like

Recognise it early. The earliest moment is the cheapest.

Early signals

What you notice first

Small, and easy to explain away.

  • Political change reopens terms
  • Performance deductions disputed
  • Change in law claims
  • Public criticism
What is at stake

What waiting can cost

Usually more than the original issue.

  • Public service continuity
  • Taxpayer value
  • Investor returns

§ 02The Neutral route

Usually: Standing Neutral.

A Neutral with standing knowledge keeps a long public relationship working through change.

Human checkpoint. Guidance, not legal advice. You choose the role; the Neutral discloses conflicts and accepts a mandate before any file is shared.

§ 03The steps

What a good process looks like.

  1. Use the contract’s review mechanismsBefore anything else01
  2. Appoint a Standing Neutral or boardThe moment independence enters02
  3. Evaluate disputed issues independentlyWhere the work is done03
  4. Report transparentlySo it holds04

§ 04Prepare and avoid

What to bring. What to leave out.

(Bring)

01

Concession agreement

02

Performance data

03

Change history

04

Public accountability requirements

(Avoid)

✕

Political escalation before process

§ 05Your version

Every situation is different. Describe yours.

Write in your own words. Leave out names and confidential details.

§ 06Related

Read next.