HomeWho it’s forBoards & directors
TN/AUD/04
Edition 2027 · effective 1 January 2027
For boards & directors
Independent scrutiny before a consequential board decision.
When a proposal involves material financial, technical or governance uncertainty, a properly scoped independent assessment can test its assumptions, missing evidence and alternative outcomes. It does not replace the board’s judgement. It helps the board see what that judgement must take into account. Independent chairing and facilitation help when the room itself is split.
§ 01What you really need
Five needs, in your words.
Drawn from how people in your position actually describe the problem, not from procedure.
(Needs)
Visible fairness
A process that will stand up to shareholders, regulators and courts.
An outside reference
Independent views on contested questions.
Keeping authority
Help that does not take the decision away from the board.
Confidentiality
Board matters handled discreetly.
A clean record
Minutes and process that protect directors.
What usually goes wrong: lobbying outside the boardroom; using a conflicted chair for a conflicted decision; commissioning advice that only one faction trusts.
§ 02The cost of waiting
What the evidence says.
Sourced and dated. Use the calculator to estimate your own.
People worldwide with a moderate or high sense of grievance against business, government and the rich.
Edelman Trust Barometer 2025, via Cooley PubCo · 2025 ↗People who worry that journalists, government officials and CEOs intentionally lie to them.
Edelman Trust Barometer 2025, via Cooley PubCo · 2025 ↗§ 03Evaluation for you
7 questions people in your position bring to an evaluator.
§ 04Situations you may face
8 situations where a Neutral helps.
§ 05Roles that fit
The Neutral roles people like you use most.
§ 06How we can help
Evaluation services for people in your position.
Clarity DeepView™
A full Independent Neutral Evaluation™ with the twelve-part report of the Handbook (NP 6.3): mandate, evidence, issue-by-issue analysis, risk and uncertainty, calibrated conclusions and stated limitations. Sold against a specific question and deliverable, not a template.
Scoped fixed fee or capped day ratesEvaluation Panels
Two or three qualified evaluators from different disciplines, one chairing, who report jointly. A selective, high-value format for major projects, AI systems, institutional reviews and public decisions, where specialist recruitment and governance are demanding.
Annual retainer plus Snapshots as usedStanding Evaluator
A qualified evaluator appointed at the start of a relationship, kept informed, and available to give an independent view whenever a question arises. Activation rules, response times and information access are written into the agreement.
§ 07Frame your question
Describe it. Get the evaluation question.
Written for boards & directors. Leave out names and confidential details.
Explain neutrality to me as…
Your question (optional)
Connecting…
The answer
§ 08Read next