HomeIntelligenceCommerce across borders
TN/INT/04
Edition 2027 · effective 1 January 2027
Data story
Disputes are larger than ever. Users want more than one way to resolve them.
International commerce runs on enforceable outcomes and trusted Neutrals.
§ 01Caseload
A record year for international disputes.
Record value of new ICC cases in 2024: 841 cases, 2,392 parties from 136 jurisdictions.
ICC Dispute Resolution Statistics 2024, via Global Legal Post · 2024 ↗Users who prefer international arbitration combined with mediation or other ADR for cross-border disputes (2,402 respondents).
Queen Mary University of London & White & Case, 2025 International Arbitration Survey · 2025 ↗Commercial mediations that settle on the day, with a further ~20% settling in the following weeks.
CEDR, Mediation success rate · 2024 ↗§ 02Preference
How users want cross-border disputes resolved.
Preferred method for cross-border disputes, 2025 (2,402 respondents)
§ 03Enforcement
The conventions that make outcomes travel.
Contracting states to the New York Convention on foreign arbitral awards (1958).
New York Convention Guide · 2023 ↗States party to the Singapore Convention on Mediation (60 signatories), in force since 12 September 2020.
UNCITRAL status table · 2026 ↗Global Pound Conference delegates who named external lawyers as the main obstacle to change in commercial dispute resolution (4,000+ stakeholders, 24 countries).
Global Pound Conference series report, via Herbert Smith Freehills · 2018 ↗§ 04Read with care
Scale of the problem, not proof of a solution.
These figures describe the scale of conflict, distrust or unmet justice need. They are not evidence of the effect of Neutral Evaluation, or of TheNeutralsORG™. Outcome evidence will come from studies of actual neutral interventions, which the Research programme will publish with population, method and limits. See Sources & method.