An international institution for Independent Neutral Evaluation

HomeNeutral EvaluationUse casesDifferences & disputes

TN/USE/23
Edition 2027 · effective 1 January 2027

Differences & disputes · A cross-border commercial difference

Two legal cultures, one contract, and growing distance.

An evaluator fluent in both commercial cultures gives a confidential view of the merits and the practical routes, including enforceability of any outcome.

§ 01The evaluation question

What the evaluator is asked.

“Under the governing law and the contract, how is this difference likely to be resolved?”

(The question)

Commissioned by. Both companies
When. Before notices of dispute
Usual protocol. A · Joint-party evaluation

§ 02What is examined

The evidence, and the output.

The evaluator examines

The evidence

Material reviewed, and what was not available, is always stated.

  • Contract and governing law
  • Performance record
  • Enforcement routes
  • Commercial options
You receive

A merits view and a route map

A reasoned view. The decision stays with you.

  • It will not: local legal advice that must come from licensed counsel

§ 03Depth and time

Usually: Early Neutral Evaluation.

An independent view of the merits of a difference. Typical time: Two to four weeks.

§ 04Your version

Every case is different. Frame yours.

Write in your own words. Leave out names and confidential details.

§ 05Related

Read next.