Boards + committees
Chairing, evaluation, facilitation, special review and standing governance capability.
Neutral Practice appears in boardrooms, projects, institutions, commercial relationships, family enterprises, professional systems, workplaces and cross-border transactions. The profession is not defined by a venue. It is defined by the independent function performed there. A Neutral can work in a formal hearing, a project review, a board meeting, a private mediation, a family council, an institutional channel or a remote cross-border process. What changes is the context, authority and mandate. What should remain recognisable is independence, competence and professional discipline.
Chairing, evaluation, facilitation, special review and standing governance capability.
Standing Neutral, Dispute Boards, evaluation, determination and interface facilitation.
Supplier, customer, JV, alliance, valuation, earn-out and post-acquisition questions.
Member process, independent review, ethics, governance and Ombuds systems.
Succession, sibling ownership, family councils, trusts and shared assets.
Independent channels, facilitation and early professional support around difficult internal concerns.
Professional discovery shaped by role, sector, jurisdiction, language and corridor context.
Expert Determination and arbitration where the governing framework confers decision authority.
Context matters because information flows, participant expectations, legal frameworks and consequences change. Project familiarity can be valuable without creating management responsibility. Board process authority can be strong without creating a vote. An Ombuds channel can be trusted without becoming an investigation. Cross-border experience can improve context without becoming proof of governing-law expertise.
Wherever a system needs independence without wanting to surrender its own responsibility.
This is why the profession appears before conflict, during conflict and after positions harden. The setting tells us what must keep working. The Neutral role tells us what independence is being asked to do.
Neutrals work around board deadlock, information strain, special committees, director conflict, founder-investor tension and other governance situations where process can improve without transferring formal board authority.
Sector familiarity and Neutral role competence are separate. Verify the actual practice evidence and contractual experience.
Residence, nationality, language and jurisdiction experience should remain distinct where the data permits.
Executive or governance seniority does not automatically create independent chairing competence or professional standing.
Where they work does not define the authority. The charter and mandate still control what the Ombuds may do.
Neutral Practice can support those moments without replacing the authority, advice or management that properly belongs elsewhere.
Only currently published professional records are shown.

Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: Nityesh is a Barrister-at-Law (Inner Temple) having practised in Mauritius for the past 4 years, a Mediator (UK and US) and an International Trade Specialist. He is a holder of…

Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: Mr. Erlich is primarily a litigator, where his emphasis is on constitutional, employment, and civil rights issues. His most common cases involve violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights…

Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: Jane focuses on general corporate and contractual claims, fraud and project disputes to include pharma, energy, technology, IP claims and media disputes. Jane has particular experience of international dispute resolution…

Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: SOME ARBITRATION EXPERIENCE Acted as arbitrator between APD Ltd and Business Connexion in a dispute arising from the termination of a dollarized Lease Agreement; Is co-arbitrator in a London-seated ICC…