The right role depends on whether the project needs continuing access to a Neutral, a defined assessment, specialist decision or negotiated movement.
The project still has to move even when the relationship is under strain.
Live projects cannot always wait for a dispute to mature. Delay, scope, interface, payment and performance questions may need independent attention while design, construction, commissioning or operations continue.
Programme and site activity continue while positions harden.
Different contractors or packages see the same interface differently.
The parties may need each other long after the immediate issue is resolved.
A project issue can grow faster than the formal dispute process built to resolve it later.
Standing Neutral, Neutral Evaluation, facilitation and specialist determination can create independent capability closer to the point where the project actually needs a decision.
Project strain becomes expensive when every technical question starts carrying commercial history.
Look for the issues that are now preventing decisions, coordination or confidence.
Design, supply, access or package boundaries are contested.
Scope and commercial consequences are no longer aligned.
Each side builds a different story about programme impact.
Acceptance and technical performance block progress.
Payment positions begin to influence technical cooperation.
The project is larger than the dispute and must remain visible around the Neutral process.
A strong route protects live delivery while defining one issue tightly enough for independent professional work.
Standing Neutral creates continuing independent capability through the life of the relationship.
Neutral Evaluation can provide clarity without deciding every contractual consequence.
Delivery authority, engineering responsibility and commercial management remain with the project participants.
The project route should match how quickly the issue needs attention and how much authority is required.
Continuing access, independent assessment, negotiated movement and specialist decision are different professional functions.
Standing Neutral
Use a Standing Neutral where the relationship benefits from a known independent professional who can be activated as issues arise.
A live-project mandate should solve the question without taking over the project.
Keep project authority, technical responsibility and Neutral authority separate.
Define the interface, variation, delay, payment or performance question.
Identify activities that should not be frozen by the process.
Set the project record required for the Neutral's work.
Keep engineering, project management and commercial authority visible.
Match process intensity to live project timing.
Assessment, agreed next step or specialist determination should be clear.
Live project strain often branches into narrower technical and commercial situations.
Use the issue route that best reflects what is currently blocking progress.
When package or partner responsibility is the main issue.
PAYMENT Supplier / customer strainWhen payment and commercial relationship are blocking delivery.
CONTINUITY Standing Neutral programmeWhen the project needs continuing independent capability.
SECTOR Construction & InfrastructureFor wider project-sector context.
BOARD Dispute Board PracticeFor contract-linked project dispute mechanisms.
Search for project fit after the Neutral function is clear.
Relevant project type, technical domain, jurisdiction, contract environment and current professional standing may all affect appointment fit.
Do not search by prestige before the mandate is clear.
Use only the professional context that materially affects fit.
Use the Global Register, then run matter-specific conflict and availability checks.
A live project needs a process fast enough to matter before positions harden into the final account.
The right Neutral function should respond to the project lifecycle, not merely to the legal dispute that may arrive later.
Construction, energy, technology or infrastructure delivery may need decisions while the commercial relationship is under strain.
Technical interpretation, payment, sequencing, interface, change or responsibility should be defined tightly enough to act on.
A route that produces the perfect answer too late can still fail the project.
Standing support, evaluation, determination or facilitation carry different authority and should not be mixed casually.
A project process should help live delivery without destroying the factual or contractual record needed later.
The project is larger than the issue in front of the Neutral.
A good mandate should solve or contain one live pressure while leaving project management, technical authority and contractual responsibility with the parties.
Keep delivery moving without turning the Neutral into project management.
Project strain becomes easier to manage when speed, authority and scope are designed together.
Define the live project question
Separate the immediate issue from accumulated commercial history and the eventual final-account dispute.
Choose continuing or one-off support
Use Standing Neutral where recurring availability matters; use evaluation, determination or facilitation where one defined question is the real need.
Protect project authority
The owner, contractor, engineer, project manager and other authorised actors should remain responsible for their own functions.
Set a rapid information route
Agree what the Neutral sees, how factual material is exchanged and how urgent issues are escalated.
Preserve later rights where required
The project process should state the intended status of the Neutral's work so users know whether it is advisory, binding, interim or otherwise defined.
Current public professional records
Only currently published professional records are shown.

Henning Schroder
Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: Numerous publications on corporate and tax issues (for details see publications ) Secondary occupation: Member of the State Law Examination Office in the Lower Saxony Ministry of Justice (Chairman Examiner…

Mofesomo Tayo-Oyetibo
Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: Experience includes providing legal advisory services to clients on the commercial aspects of their entry into the Nigerian market or ongoing operations in the country. Career History Managing Counsel, Twelve…

Patricia Galloway
Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: She is also a member of the National Academy of Distinguished Neutrals. She holds a Certificate in Dispute Resolution from Pepperdine Law School-Straus Institute, a Diploma in International Arbitration, and…

Dr. Christopher D. Cottrell
Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: Sole Practitioner of a mediation practice with multi-state experience. Mediate a wide range of cases, including but not limited to, personal injury, corporate staff and organizational issues, civil court cases,…
A Neutral can support project continuity without taking over delivery.
Role boundaries should remain visible even under commercial urgency.
A defined independent project function.
- Standing Neutral availability.
- Neutral Evaluation of a bounded question.
- Expert Determination where specialist authority is appropriate.
- Facilitation or mediation of a live commercial issue.
- A clearer process for recurring project strain.
Project management or technical control.
- Not the project manager.
- Not the engineer or certifier unless separately appointed to that role.
- Not the owner's representative.
- Not automatic legal adviser.
- Not a substitute for contractual notice or formal rights-management systems.
Situation pages should remain decision aids rather than substitutes for legal, technical, regulatory or governance advice. Their job is to help the user recognise the independent professional function and then move into the correct mandate and professional search.
The strongest user journey continues from the situation into practice, then into the public professional record, current credential verification and finally matter-specific conflicts, availability and acceptance.
Situation pages should remain decision aids rather than substitutes for legal, technical, regulatory or governance advice. Their job is to help the user recognise the independent professional function and then move into the correct mandate and professional search.
The strongest user journey continues from the situation into practice, then into the public professional record, current credential verification and finally matter-specific conflicts, availability and acceptance.
The project is still moving. The professional route should help it keep moving.
Use independence close to the point of strain, with a mandate narrow enough to protect both clarity and continuity.