Boards + committees
Independent chairing, evaluation, facilitation and special process around governance strain.
The users of Neutral Practice are not one industry or one type of disputant. Boards, businesses, project organisations, public bodies, associations, universities, investors, families, professional firms and individuals use independent Neutral capability when they need a trusted process, an independent view, a defined decision, a standing presence or a better route between positions. The common feature is not conflict alone. It is a need for independence that remains useful inside a real decision or relationship.
Independent chairing, evaluation, facilitation and special process around governance strain.
Supplier, customer, JV, alliance, transaction and cross-border relationship questions.
Standing capability, Dispute Boards, early evaluation and interface facilitation.
Member process, independent review, ethics, governance and Ombuds pathways.
Multi-stakeholder process, infrastructure interfaces and independent professional input where authority remains public.
Succession, sibling ownership, family council, shared assets and private wealth governance.
Independent capability where the adviser should not become the Neutral in their own client's process.
Ombuds, mediation and other independent routes when a person needs a trusted process rather than another internal position.
The most useful way to understand demand is to look beyond organisational labels. A board may need chairing. A project may need standing capability. A family may need facilitation. A lender and borrower may need an independent view. An association may need a credible member process. The same organisation may use several Neutral roles at different times because the professional function follows the need.
Who uses Neutrals? People and institutions that need independence to become useful inside a decision, relationship or process.
That includes situations before conflict, during conflict and after positions have hardened. Neutral Practice is broader than one dispute-resolution moment because independence can support prevention, governance, decision support, settlement, formal determination and continuing relationships.
Boards use Neutral capability when disagreement, conflicts, information strain or sensitive process need an independent layer without transferring formal board authority.
Explore this context ->
Cross-border Neutral Practice adds context to the search without making nationality or corridor membership a substitute for professional evidence.
Only currently published professional records are shown.

Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: In METROPOLITAN FRANCE and overseas (REUNION, EUROPE, SWITZERLAND, MAURITUS, MADAGASCAR, BALI, USA) Member of the French Bar Association since 1996 up to date. Principal areas of practice: counsel and judiciary…

Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: As an experienced lawyer, Jonathan is highly qualified for mediation in a wide range of disputes in high-tech market sectors including in the following areas: Intellectual Property (including patent licensing,…

Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: Stephen S. Strick is an Alternative Dispute Resolution Specialist with over thirty years of experience as an international and domestic arbitrator and mediator. Mr. Strick has served as Chair, sole…

Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: EXPERIENCE Managing Partner at Vázquez Tercero & Zepeda (1992-present) With over 25 years in the firm, Adrian Vazquez advises and represents a number of national and multinational companies, as well…