The annual cycle keeps the professional record current rather than permanent by default.
Current professional standing with sector and jurisdiction context.
The Annual Certified Neutrals Bench™ is a separate annual constitution of professional capability by sector or practice area and jurisdiction. It sits alongside certification and helps make current professional standing easier to discover in context.
A current professional reference universe.
Bench constitution is category-specific and time-bound. It is not a permanent directory and not an entitlement created by certification alone.
Current standing is reviewed and recorded rather than allowed to become a legacy listing.
The category itself explains where the professional visibility sits.
The ceiling is a maximum for a category, not a quota that must be filled.
Two professional decisions. Two different jobs.
Certification recognises professional standing. Annual Bench constitution adds current sector and jurisdiction positioning after separate review. Keeping the two apart makes both easier to understand.
Professional standing.
Certification belongs to the professional record and can continue independently of any particular annual Bench category.
Current category positioning.
Bench status does not arise automatically from certification and does not create a right to appointments.
The Bench only makes sense when the category is precise.
A worldwide list of names would weaken the idea. The useful unit is small enough to mean something: a current annual cycle, a defined professional field and a defined jurisdiction.
A defined field where subject knowledge and professional context may matter.
The geographic context in which the annual professional reference is constituted.
One annual Bench category. Other sectors and jurisdictions are separate constitutions.
Build the category before looking for names.
This page helps a visitor understand the Bench category first, then move into relevant professional records. It does not invent current constitution status where an approved current Bench record is not published.
Choose a category.
Sector and jurisdiction define the public route. The annual cycle remains fixed to the 2027 constitution on this page.
Construction & Infrastructure - India
A defined 2027 professional reference category combining sector context, jurisdiction and current professional standing.
Professional standing with sector depth.
Sector Benches create a clearer route into professional capability where subject-matter context matters. Each sector can then be explored by jurisdiction and professional record.
Project, contract and infrastructure contexts.
ENERGY Energy - Oil - Gas - ClimateEnergy, natural resources and climate-related professional context.
FINANCE Banking - Finance - Capital MarketsFinancial, transaction and capital-market context.
TECHNOLOGY Technology - Data - DigitalTechnology, data and complex digital questions.
MARITIME Maritime - Trade - LogisticsShipping, trade and cross-border commercial context.
EXPLORE ALL Sector + JurisdictionMove from the category into public professional records and current standing.
A ceiling is useful only when it stays a ceiling.
The maximum-ten principle is intended to preserve a controlled category. It should never be presented as a quota that the institution must fill.
Fewer than ten can be the right constitution.
The Bench should reflect the available professional record and the needs of the category. If the category does not support ten suitable positions, there is no reason to fill ten.
per defined sector or practice area, per jurisdiction, within the annual cycle
The ceiling does not create exclusivity outside the defined category. It does not mean that a non-Bench professional lacks competence, and it does not create priority for case appointments.
The annual record should be deliberate and current.
The constitution process should move from a defined category into current professional recognition, category composition and an explicit annual decision.
State annual cycle, jurisdiction and sector or practice area.
Use the professional record relevant to the defined cycle.
Consider sector depth, professional diversity and category needs.
Treat ten as the ordinary maximum, not a target.
Offer, do not offer or defer category constitution.
The offered position enters the annual record after acceptance and applicable formalities.
Later professional selection starts with the actual matter, not Bench order.
A serious professional can come into view in more than one way.
The Bench should not depend on one open application funnel. Professional consideration can begin through institutional knowledge, nomination or a practitioner's own expression of interest.
The nomination begins consideration. It does not predetermine the outcome.
Peer knowledge can bring a relevant professional record into view for formal consideration.
The institution may identify a professional whose record appears relevant to a defined category.
The same standards and annual constitution logic should apply regardless of how the profile entered consideration.
The Bench informs the search. The matter decides the fit.
Bench constitution creates a current professional reference universe. It should never turn into an appointment queue or create an expectation that cases will be distributed in Bench order.
Create a current professional reference category.
It makes sector, jurisdiction and current professional standing easier to discover together.
Determine suitability for the actual appointment.
Role fit, experience, conflicts, independence, availability, language, mandate and the specific needs of the matter remain separate appointment questions.
Current public professional records
Only currently published professional records are shown.

Joshua Erlich
Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: Mr. Erlich is primarily a litigator, where his emphasis is on constitutional, employment, and civil rights issues. His most common cases involve violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights…

Steve Lanckens
Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: Since 1999 I have specialised in arbitration, mediation and negotiation. In 2011 I engaged in advanced study in Peace and Conflict Studies at Sydney University. Various appointments to arbitral and…

Gunita Pahwa
Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: Ms. Pahwa has wide experience with representing the clients before various regulatory bodies, arbitral tribunals, etc. Ms. Pahwa has broad experience in domestic and international arbitrations, including ad-hoc and institutional…

Fatima Balfaqeeh
Managing Partner
Published record: Ms. Fatima Abdulla Balfaqeeh is a UAE-based lawyer, independent arbitrator, and certified mediator with more than 20 years of professional experience in dispute resolution, procurement, and contracts across the public…
Use the Bench for context. Use the wider system for standing and fit.
See the three certification grades and the professional system around them.
DISCOVER Find a NeutralSearch professional capability when you have a matter or appointment requirement.
REGISTER Verify public professional standingUse the authoritative public record when the professional is already known.
JURISDICTIONS Explore professional capability by marketMove into country pages and current professional context.
The Annual Certified Neutrals Bench™ should answer a narrower question than certification: who is currently positioned within a defined professional category?
That category can combine sector and jurisdiction context while remaining subordinate to the underlying credential and live professional record.
Is the professional currently recognised?
Bench consideration begins from current institutional standing. The Bench should not become an alternate route around certification.
What exactly is being constituted?
A category should be precise enough to mean something, such as a defined sector and jurisdiction, rather than a broad global list of names.
Does the record support inclusion now?
Current role, sector evidence, jurisdiction context and public professional record may all matter to annual constitution.
A ceiling of ten should remain a ceiling, not a target that the institution feels obliged to fill.
Some categories may properly contain fewer professionals where the current evidence does not justify a larger constitution.
Constitute the category from the evidence outward.
The credibility of the Bench depends on being willing to leave places empty.
The institution should first define the category precisely. Sector and jurisdiction should be meaningful to users and supported by enough professional evidence to justify a distinct Bench view.
Current certification standing should be checked before category positioning. A Bench listing cannot substitute for the underlying credential, and loss or change of standing should be reflected appropriately.
Sector evidence should be more than a generic career label. The professional record should show why the individual is relevant to the defined sector through work, appointments, specialist responsibility or another credible connection.
Jurisdiction evidence should also be precise. Location, qualification, market experience and corridor work are different forms of connection. Bench constitution should use the type of evidence relevant to the category rather than one universal geographic rule.
The annual cycle exists because professional positioning changes. A practitioner may deepen a sector, move jurisdiction, become inactive, change practice or develop conflicts that affect current availability. Annual constitution allows the reference universe to remain intentional.
Ten should remain the maximum, not the quota. If only four professionals currently meet the category logic, four can be the stronger institutional result.
Bench inclusion should not become a commercial entitlement attached to Fellowship, membership, event participation or sponsorship. It is a separate current-positioning decision.
Users should also understand what the Bench cannot do. It can narrow a professional search and show current category context. It cannot know the complete facts of a future matter, clear conflicts or determine availability in advance.
The strongest user journey therefore moves from category to profile, from profile to credential verification and from verified standing into matter-specific suitability and conflicts review.
That sequence makes the Bench useful without turning it into a ranking. The category is a professional reference universe, not a declaration that number one is better than number ten.
Bench discovery should always reconnect to the wider profession.
A category is one lens. The Global Register remains the wider public professional record.
Current category context.
- A defined annual sector and jurisdiction view.
- A limited reference universe.
- A route into public professional profiles.
- A connection back to credential verification.
- A starting point for a matter-specific search.
A professional league table.
- No rank order of quality.
- No guarantee of appointment.
- No permanent entitlement to inclusion.
- No automatic inclusion from credential grade.
- No replacement for the Global Register.
A current professional category should tell you where the standing sits and when it was constituted.
Keep certification separate. Keep the category precise. Keep the annual record current. Then let each real matter decide which professional is suitable.