Independent process can help when transaction terms and operating reality begin to diverge.
The transaction closed. The relationship it created is only beginning.
Post-acquisition strain can combine earn-outs, integration, retained founders, performance expectations, working capital, warranties, governance and cultural change. A Neutral can help separate one disputed issue from the entire history of the deal.
The buyer and seller may disagree on results and on how the business was operated.
Systems, people and authority may no longer match deal expectations.
Governance and day-to-day authority can become personal and commercial at once.
Post-acquisition conflict is often the point where transaction language meets operating reality.
Valuation, governance, performance and relationship questions may all exist together. The Neutral route should define which one needs independent attention now.
Post-acquisition strain becomes difficult when every integration problem is interpreted through the purchase agreement.
Separate operating friction from defined transaction questions before choosing the process.
Results, methodology and buyer conduct may all be disputed.
Systems, reporting or personnel decisions change expected performance.
Identity, control and contractual obligations overlap.
Working capital, leakage or other mechanics may still be contested.
Warranty or indemnity issues begin to shape trust after closing.
The purchase agreement, the operating business and the new ownership relationship should stay visible as separate layers.
The Neutral can work on one layer without taking over integration or deciding every claim.
Neutral Evaluation or Expert Determination can isolate a defined earn-out or adjustment issue.
Mediation or facilitation can address future working arrangements where the parties remain connected.
Operational authority and transaction advice remain with the parties and their advisers.
Choose the route from whether the parties need a value answer, operating movement or an independent reference point.
Do not ask one process to become transaction review, integration management and dispute resolution at once.
Expert Determination / Neutral Evaluation
Use a specialist or evaluative route where a defined earn-out, working-capital or calculation issue can be isolated.
A post-acquisition mandate should identify which part of the deal aftermath is actually in scope.
Keep transaction rights, operating authority and Neutral authority separate.
Earn-out, adjustment, integration, role, governance or warranty.
Buyer, seller, retained management and business teams may have different roles.
Keep ownership, board and management authority visible.
Purchase agreement, disclosure, financials and integration plans.
Protect the business, customers and critical integration activity.
Assessment, agreement, process route or specialist decision.
Post-acquisition strain often connects into value, founder and governance routes.
Move laterally when one layer becomes the real professional problem.
When a defined price question can be isolated.
FOUNDERS Founder conflictWhen retained founders and ownership history drive the strain.
BOARD Board deadlockWhen governance process itself stalls.
JV Joint venture strainWhen shared ownership continues after the transaction.
SECTOR Corporate & M&AFor wider transaction context.
Find the professional for the post-closing function that is missing.
Transaction, valuation, corporate-governance, sector and jurisdiction depth should refine fit after the Neutral role is clear.
Do not search by prestige before the mandate is clear.
Sector, jurisdiction and specialist depth should refine fit.
Use the Global Register, then run matter-specific conflict and availability checks.
The situation should be separated into the few questions that actually need different professional treatment.
A clearer issue map prevents one broad label from silently transferring authority or specialist responsibility to the Neutral.
What has to work now?
People, systems, customers, approvals and reporting may need to integrate even while the parties disagree about what the transaction promised.
Is the issue contractual?
Earn-outs, warranties, adjustments, covenants or completion mechanics may need legal or specialist treatment outside the Neutral mandate.
Is the problem actually about running the business?
A post-closing issue can look contractual when the real pressure is leadership, governance, information or operational integration.
Do seller and buyer still need each other?
Transition services, earn-outs, founder retention or continuing management can make relationship repair commercially important.
Move from immediate pressure into a defined professional route.
The strongest process protects what must keep working while legal, technical, financial and institutional authority remains visible.
Separate the deal issue from the operating issue
Identify whether the immediate problem belongs to transaction documents, integration, governance or the continuing relationship.
Protect business continuity
Keep customers, staff, systems and critical approvals moving while the narrower dispute is addressed.
Use evaluation for a bounded post-closing question
Neutral Evaluation can provide an independent reference point without taking over management or the parties' contractual rights.
Use mediation where the parties need to renegotiate the relationship
Earn-outs, founder retention, integration obligations or transition arrangements may require negotiated movement rather than an outside opinion.
Keep valuation and specialist questions in their own lane
Where price, accounting or technical matters require expert authority, appoint that expertise expressly instead of assuming the Neutral supplies it.
A Neutral can add independence without becoming the underlying authority.
The live mandate should state both the useful function and the boundary around it.
A controlled post-closing process.
- Mediation of buyer-seller or retained-founder strain.
- Neutral Evaluation of a defined commercial issue.
- Facilitated integration or governance discussion.
- Sequencing between operational continuity and transaction claims.
- A clear route into valuation or specialist determination where needed.
The acquirer, seller or integration team.
- Not management.
- Not the board.
- Not the transaction lawyer by default.
- Not the accountant or valuer unless separately appointed.
- Not free to rewrite the acquisition agreement.
Current public professional records
Only currently published professional records are shown.

Dr. Austin Sammut
Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: Austin Sammut is a graduate in law, history, and economics from the University of Malta. He is a warranted advocate with the Maltese bar. He is also an accredited mediator…

John Gilmour
Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: Justice of the Federal Court of Australia from 2006 to March 2018. Delivered almost 600 judgments spanning the full body of the Court’s work, including important judgments in commercial law,…

Dr. Oliver Heinrich
Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: Prior to working as an attorney, Oliver was project manager for the European Satellite Navigation System Galileo at the German Aerospace Centre (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V.). As…

Fabio Marazzi
Arbitrator & Mediator
Published record: 1992 – Present Marazzi & Associati CEO, The European House – Ambrosetti USA (2013–2015) Vice President, GO TOWORLD (2011–2015) 1991–1992 De Bandt, Van Hecke & Lagae – Law Firm, Brussels,…
Post-acquisition strain becomes easier when the deal, the business and the new relationship stop being argued as one thing.
Define the layer under pressure and give independence one clear job.