Isabelle Poncet
Arbitrator & Mediator · Geneva, Switzerland
PROFESSIONNAL CAREER Pirker + Partners, Geneva, Partner Poncet Turrettini, Geneva (1992-2018, partner since 1998) White & Case, New York (1995-1996)

Use the institutional verification route for current standing.
Read the professional through the functions actually published on the record.
Practice fields are shown from the public professional record. No additional expertise is inferred.
mediation
Published on the structured professional record. The live mandate should define the exact function, authority and scope.
arbitration
Published on the structured professional record. The live mandate should define the exact function, authority and scope.
Published context from the professional record.
These fields support discovery and comparison. They do not create a separate certification.
Verified professional foundation where it exists.
Only values present in the structured record are shown.
- Bar Exam, Geneva, 1994
- Law Degree, Geneva University, 1992
What the public record currently says.
The profile uses the supplied public record as its source.
Isabelle Poncet in professional context.
Experience:
Pirker + Partners, Partner (2018-present)
Poncet Turrettini, Geneva (1992-2018, partner since 1998)
White & Case, New York (1995-1996)
Geneva University, Law School, teaching assistant (1994-2000)
Awards / Affiliations / Memberships:
Geneva Bar Association
Swiss Bar Federation
Swiss Arbitration Association
Swiss Penal Law ASsociation
International Penal Law Association
American Bar Association (associate)
Publications / Papers:
Commentaire des articles 192 à 195 CPP, in : Kuhn A. / Jeanneret Y. (eds), Commentaire romand du Code de procédure pénale suisse, Helbing & Lichtenhahn, Bâle, pp. 875-829
Commentaire des articles 296 à 298, 305, 310, 311 et 319, in : Macaluso A. / Moreillon L. / Queloz N. (eds), Commentaire romand du Code pénal suisse II : art. 111-392 CP, Commentaire romand, Helbing & Lichtenhahn, Bâle, pp. 1915-1926, 1971-1983, 2047-2062, 2136-2140
Additional published discovery fields.
No field is expanded beyond what is present in the public record.
Professional fit first. Conflict clearance before confirmation.
The public profile is evidence only; appointment remains matter-specific.
Continue through adjacent public records.
Related profiles are selected from the same public record set and are not rankings.