Florian Endros
Arbitrator & Mediator · Paris, France
Florian Endrös, born in 1965 in Munich, obtained a full double university degree at Munich University and Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne University. In the years 1992-1993 he was editor-in-chief of the newspaper “Droit des Affaires”. He completed his training as an avocat of the Paris Chamber of Lawyers and after passing the examination to be admitted as a German Rechtsanwalt, he

Use the institutional verification route for current standing.
Read the professional through the functions actually published on the record.
Practice fields are shown from the public professional record. No additional expertise is inferred.
mediation
Published on the structured professional record. The live mandate should define the exact function, authority and scope.
arbitration
Published on the structured professional record. The live mandate should define the exact function, authority and scope.
Published context from the professional record.
These fields support discovery and comparison. They do not create a separate certification.
What the public record currently says.
The profile uses the supplied public record as its source.
Florian Endros in professional context.
Dr. Endrös practised in in an international commercial law firm for several years. He was the founding partner and practised especially in industrial risk, before he founded the new firm EBA Endrös-Baum Associés.
He also worked as an assistant professor at Cergy-Pontoise University (Paris) and was in charge of a European university project that enabled French lawyers to study German law.
Today he is working closely with the magazine “Phi” and other journals as author of numerous publications.
The main emphasis of his practice is on complex international cases and proceedings, particularly in the fields of industrial risk, plant construction, product liability and product safety, and also on general contract and commercial law. His working languages are German, French and English.
Additional published discovery fields.
No field is expanded beyond what is present in the public record.
Professional fit first. Conflict clearance before confirmation.
The public profile is evidence only; appointment remains matter-specific.
Continue through adjacent public records.
Related profiles are selected from the same public record set and are not rankings.