Berin Simge Hikmet
Arbitrator & Mediator · Loudon, United States
Berin was called to the bar of England and Wales in the year 2000. After her pupillage at 2 Paper Buildings, Chambers of Sir Desmond de Silva QC she practiced at the English criminal bar for several years. In her early years of practice, she gained considerable advocacy experience defending and prosecuting serious criminal cases ranging from offences of dishonesty and fraud to drug trafficking and sexual offences. She appeared…

Use the institutional verification route for current standing.
Read the professional through the functions actually published on the record.
Practice fields are shown from the public professional record. No additional expertise is inferred.
mediation
Published on the structured professional record. The live mandate should define the exact function, authority and scope.
arbitration
Published on the structured professional record. The live mandate should define the exact function, authority and scope.
Published context from the professional record.
These fields support discovery and comparison. They do not create a separate certification.
Verified professional foundation where it exists.
Only values present in the structured record are shown.
-
Rugby School
-
University of Bristol – B.Sc. in Economics and Accounting
-
BPP Law School – Diploma in Law
-
Inns of Court School of Law – Bar Vocational Course
-
University of London – LL.M in International Business Law
Languages
-
Bilingual: Turkish and English
-
Knowledge and Understanding of French
What the public record currently says.
The profile uses the supplied public record as its source.
Berin Simge Hikmet in professional context.
Berin was called to the bar of England and Wales in the year 2000. After her pupillage at 2 Paper Buildings, Chambers of Sir Desmond de Silva QC she practiced at the English criminal bar for several years. In her early years of practice, she gained considerable advocacy experience defending and prosecuting serious criminal cases ranging from offences of dishonesty and fraud to drug trafficking and sexual offences. She appeared regularly at the Crown Courts all over England and has marked success at the English Court of Appeal.
In recent years she has developed an extensive practice in complex international disputes acting for and against states and state entities. She was instructed in a multimillion US dollar commercial fraud matter representing a Turkish Government entity as second junior. After completion of her Masters of Laws (LL.M.) at University of London in ‘international business law’ mainly specialising in international dispute resolution she was instructed in a series of major investment disputes involving a Central Asian State. She has since been instructed regularly in matters involving public international law, acting as counsel in investor-state disputes arising out of investment treaties and foreign investment laws acting for and against host states and investors in international arbitrations conducted under ICSID, ICC and UNCITRAL rules; and international commercial/ contractual disputes conducted under ICC, UNCITRAL, LMAA and regional rules of arbitration. Berin is certified and admitted as an arbitrator by Dubai International Arbitration Center and Energy Disputes Arbitration Center.
Berin is currently lecturing undergraduate law students at Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey teaching Investment Treaty Disputes and Investment Law.
Some of the noteworthy international disputes are:
Kılıç Inşaat İthalat İhracat Sanayi ve Tic A.Ş. v Turkmenistan (ICSID Case No ARB/10/1)– acted as counsel in jurisdictional proceedings on behalf of the respondent state, in a dispute arising out of Turkey – Turkmenistan BIT.
İçkale İnşaat Limited Şirketi v. Turkmenistan, (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/24) acted as counsel in proceedings on behalf of the respondent state, in a dispute arising out of Turkey – Turkmenistan BIT.
Muhammet Çap & Sehil Inşaat Endüstri ve Ticaret Ltd. Şti. v. Turkmenistan, (ICSID Case No. ARB/12/6) – acted as counsel in jurisdictional proceedings on behalf of the respondent state, in a dispute arising out of Turkey – Turkmenistan BIT.
Garanti Koza LLP v. Turkmenistan, (ICSID Case No. ARB/11/20) acted as counsel in proceedings on behalf of the respondent state, in a dispute arising out of United Kingdom – Turkmenistan BIT.
Adem Doğan v. Turkmenistan, (ICSID Case No. ARB/09/9) – acted as counsel in proceedings on behalf of the respondent state, in a dispute arising out of Germany – Turkmenistan BIT.
Other unreported disputes:
Acted on behalf of respondent Central Asian State in an international dispute arising out of a BIT conducted under UNCITAL rules of arbitration.
Acted on behalf of claimant in an energy dispute against a Middle Eastern State, in proceedings conducted under ICC rules of arbitration.
Acted on behalf of claimant in a commercial dispute involving charter-party agreement, in proceedings conducted under LMAA rules of arbitration.
Acted on behalf of respondent in a commercial dispute (M&A dispute) involving petrochemical companies, in proceedings conducted under regional arbitration rules.
Acted on behalf of claimant investor against a Central Asian State and successfully secured third party funding in an investment dispute arising out of a BIT.
MembershipsMiddle Temple InnChartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb)
Young Arbitrators Forum of ICC
Criminal Bar Association
Additional published discovery fields.
No field is expanded beyond what is present in the public record.
Professional fit first. Conflict clearance before confirmation.
The public profile is evidence only; appointment remains matter-specific.
Continue through adjacent public records.
Related profiles are selected from the same public record set and are not rankings.