Apoorva J. Patel
Arbitrator & Mediator · Washington, United States
Apoorva Patel is a senior associate in WilmerHale\'s Litigation/Controversy Department and a member of the firm\'s International Arbitration Practice Group. His practice focuses on the resolution of international disputes through arbitration and litigation. Mr. Patel has represented clients across a range of industries in all aspects of international investor-state and commercial arbitrations. He also has extensive experience in cross-border litigation

Use the institutional verification route for current standing.
Read the professional through the functions actually published on the record.
Practice fields are shown from the public professional record. No additional expertise is inferred.
mediation
Published on the structured professional record. The live mandate should define the exact function, authority and scope.
arbitration
Published on the structured professional record. The live mandate should define the exact function, authority and scope.
Published context from the professional record.
These fields support discovery and comparison. They do not create a separate certification.
Verified professional foundation where it exists.
Only values present in the structured record are shown.
- JD, Harvard Law School, 2013, Editorin-Chief, Harvard Negotiation Law Review; Dean\'s Scholar Prize
- BA, magna cum laude, Duke University, 2010
What the public record currently says.
The profile uses the supplied public record as its source.
Apoorva J. Patel in professional context.
Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Patel was a member of the international arbitration, litigation and intellectual property practices in the New York office of a global law firm. At Harvard Law School, Mr. Patel was Editor-in-Chief of the Harvard Negotiation Law Review, a leading journal of scholarship on alternative dispute resolution. He also advised the Ministry of Justice of Chile on a pilot alternative dispute resolution program through the Harvard Negotiation and Mediation Clinical Program.
Experience:
Apoorva Patel is an international arbitration and litigation attorney based in Washington, D.C. His practice focuses on the resolution of international disputes, and he has extensive experience in all aspects of arbitration, litigation in U.S. federal and state courts, and the negotiation and mediation of commercial disputes. Mr. Patel is also experienced in global intellectual property matters, particularly trademark disputes. Mr. Patel has practiced at leading global law firms in Washington, D.C. and New York City, where he has focused on complex international arbitration, litigation, and intellectual property matters.
Publications & Speaking Engagements:
Author, “A New Chapter in the Confirmation of International Arbitration Awards Vacated at Their Seat,” Young ICCA Blog (2017)
Author, “Evaluating the Reforms to India’s Arbitration Regime,” International Bar Association Arbitration News, Vol. 21, No. 2 (2016)
Co-author, “International Arbitration in New York: A Practical Perspective,” Indian Journal of Arbitration Law, Vol. 5, No. 1 (2016)
Moderator, “Breaking into International Arbitration,” New York University School of Law (2016)
Co-author, “US Appellate Court Permits Attachment of Assets in Suit to Compel Arbitration,” LexisNexis UK LexisPSL (2017)
Membership
New York, District of Columbia
Education:
Mr. Patel earned his law degree from Harvard Law School and his undergraduate degree from Duke University. Mr. Patel served as Editor-in-Chief of the Harvard Negotiation Law Review (a leading journal of scholarship on alternative dispute resolution), advised the Ministry of Justice of Chile on a pilot alternative dispute program through the Harvard Negotiation & Mediation Clinical Program, received a Dean’s Scholar Prize, and served as President of the Harvard South Asian Law Students Association.
Additional published discovery fields.
No field is expanded beyond what is present in the public record.
Professional fit first. Conflict clearance before confirmation.
The public profile is evidence only; appointment remains matter-specific.
Continue through adjacent public records.
Related profiles are selected from the same public record set and are not rankings.